Council to consider banning cancer-linked chemical

Dudley Council is to consider banning the use of a pesticide linked to cancer in parks and open spaces.

At a meeting of the authority on October 20, councillors voted to accept a notice of motion calling for the cabinet to consider a report on the potential risks of Glyphosate-based pesticides.

The notice of motion, from Cllr Andrew Tromans, also calls on cabinet members to consult with friends groups at several popular parks across the borough and consider ceasing the use of the chemicals.

Cllr Tromans told the meeting: “Concern over the use of pesticides such as Glyphosate is something I have encountered on the doorsteps since entering public life, the motion seeks to address the concerns whilst balancing the need to deliver services in a cost-effective manner.”

Although Glyphosate is approved by the Health and Safety Executive, Cllr Tromans’ notice of motion said: “There is research to suggest that Glyphosate-based pesticides and herbicides have devastating direct and indirect impacts on flora and fauna and are associated with several forms of cancer, with children particularly at risk.”

Cllr Damian Corfield, Dudley cabinet member for neighbourhoods, told councillors the authority has cut usage in parks but he added: “I cannot support the immediate banning of Glyphosate, it is a valuable tool to control weed growth but more importantly invasive species.

“Viable alternatives are not easily found or funded, in many cases the alternative would be manual removal which is cost sensitive.” 

Cllr Ellen Cobb spoke in support of the motion, she said: “Over 80 local authorities across the UK have already phased out or committed to phase out Glyphosate.

“There are growing concerns among pet owners, Glyphosate can take up to an hour to dry during which time animals may walk through or ingest contaminated plants.

“Residents have raised concerns about illness and fatalities linked to exposure.”

Following the debate, councillors voted to approve the motion with 37 in favour and 14 against, there were eight abstentions.